Journal Information  l  e-Submission  l  View-FullText
Journal Information > Editor's & Reviewer's Guide
Indexed by / Related sites
   LISA
 
   DOAJ
 
   PASCAL
 
   crossref
 
   crosscheck
 
   OASPA
 
   EBSCOhost
 
   Google Scholar
 
   SHERPA/ROMEO
 
 

Editor's & Reviewer's Guide



Help for Editors, Help for Reviewers

 

  Review Form
  General Questions

- poor, below average, average, good, excellent

1. How original is the work presented in the paper?
- Is the article sufficiently novel and interesting to warrant publication?
- Does the study extend previous research in an original way?
 
2. How significant are the contributions of the paper?
- Is the research question an important one?
- Are the findings important enough to warrant publication?
 
3. Is the content logical and professional?

- Is the article clearly laid out?
- Do authors clearly state their hypothesis, describe the methodology, and explain the findings?

 
4. Is the writing style and presentation appropriate?
- Is the article well-written?
- Are figures and tables adequate and complementary to the content?
 
5. How confident are you in your assessment of the paper?
- Is the subject area of the paper in your field of expertise?
- How familiar are you with literature in the field?

 

   Recommendation

- accept, accept w/ revision, rereview after revision, reject

 

   Confidential Comments to the Editor

 

   Comments to the Author

- Originality (Q.1)
- Contributions (Q.2)
- Structure (Q.3)
- Presentation (Q.4)
- Other comments